The Second Coming of Christ in Catholic Teaching

Quick Insights

The Catholic Church teaches that Jesus Christ will return at the end of history in glory, power, and majesty to judge the living and the dead and to bring all creation to its final fulfillment in God.
The Second Coming, known in theological tradition as the Parousia, a Greek word meaning “presence” or “arrival,” is a defined and binding truth of Catholic faith affirmed in both the Apostles’ Creed and the Nicene Creed.
Christ’s return will be visible, personal, and bodily, not a spiritual or symbolic event, and will be witnessed by all of humanity simultaneously.
The Church teaches that no one except the Father knows the exact day or hour of Christ’s return, and Catholics are therefore called to live in constant readiness rather than to speculate about precise dates or timelines.
The Second Coming will coincide with the resurrection of the dead, the Last Judgment, and the definitive establishment of God’s eternal Kingdom, completing the whole arc of salvation history.
Catholic teaching firmly rejects millenarianism, the belief that Christ will reign on earth for a literal thousand-year period before the final judgment, as a distortion incompatible with the authentic gospel.

Introduction

The Second Coming of Christ stands at the very horizon of Catholic faith, the great future event toward which all of Sacred Scripture, all of Christian life, and all of human history moves with purpose and certainty. The Church confesses this truth at every Sunday Mass when the faithful proclaim in the Nicene Creed that Christ “will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no end,” and she renews the same confession at the heart of the Eucharistic Prayer when the congregation acclaims, “We proclaim your death, O Lord, and profess your resurrection until you come again.” This liturgical repetition is not mere ritual formality; it expresses the living and expectant faith of a community that takes seriously the promise Christ himself made to his Apostles when he ascended into heaven, a promise that the angels at the Ascension confirmed when they told the astonished disciples, “This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven” (Acts 1:11). The Catechism of the Catholic Church treats the Second Coming as an integral element of the faith, affirming that Christ’s return will bring history to its conclusion and that this event, called the Parousia from the Greek word for arrival or presence, constitutes the ultimate hope of the Church (CCC 668-677). Understanding what the Church actually teaches about this event requires careful attention to Scripture, Tradition, and the Magisterium, because the topic has attracted considerable speculation, misunderstanding, and even sensationalist interpretation across the centuries. The Catholic tradition steers a precise and measured course between the extremes of dismissing the Second Coming as a vague metaphor on one side, and constructing elaborate prophetic timelines from selective biblical texts on the other.

The history of the Church’s reflection on the Second Coming reveals a consistent affirmation of the core doctrine alongside considerable development in the precision with which the Church has articulated what she does and does not teach about the manner, timing, and circumstances of Christ’s return. The earliest Christian communities lived with an intense and urgent expectation of the Lord’s return, expressed throughout the letters of Saint Paul, the Book of Revelation, and the Didache, one of the oldest non-biblical Christian documents, which concludes with the Aramaic prayer “Maranatha,” meaning “Come, Lord.” As the Church moved through the second and third centuries and the immediate intensity of early expectation settled into a longer perspective, theologians such as Saint Justin Martyr and Saint Irenaeus of Lyon reflected more systematically on the relationship between the Parousia, the resurrection of the dead, and the final state of creation. Saint Augustine’s monumental work The City of God, written in the fifth century partly in response to the fall of Rome, provided the most influential patristic framework for understanding the Parousia within the broader sweep of history, arguing against overly literal interpretations of prophetic texts while affirming the full reality of Christ’s return and its consequences. The Fourth Lateran Council in 1215 formally defined that Christ will come at the end of time to judge all the living and the dead, placing the Second Coming among the Church’s solemnly defined truths. The Second Vatican Council, in Lumen Gentium and Gaudium et Spes, reflected on the Parousia in relationship to the Church’s nature, mission, and hope, presenting Christ’s return not as a threat to human history but as its ultimate destination and completion. This article presents the full Catholic teaching on the Second Coming, drawing on all of these sources, so that the reader may hold this truth with the combination of theological precision, spiritual seriousness, and confident hope that it deserves.

The Promise of the Second Coming in Sacred Scripture

No aspect of the Second Coming rests on firmer biblical ground than the direct and repeated promise of Christ’s return in his own words, spoken to his disciples on multiple occasions during his earthly ministry and confirmed by the testimony of the Apostles throughout the New Testament. Jesus speaks most extensively about his return in what scholars call the eschatological discourse, that is, his extended teaching on the last things, found in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21, in which he describes the signs that will precede his coming, including tribulation, the spread of false prophets, and the preaching of the gospel to all nations. He tells his disciples plainly, “Then they will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory, and then he will send out the angels and gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of heaven” (Mark 13:26-27). The imagery of clouds and glory connects directly with the vision of Daniel in the Old Testament, where Daniel sees “one like a son of man coming with the clouds of heaven” and receiving “dominion and glory and kingdom” from the Ancient of Days (Daniel 7:13-14), and Jesus deliberately applies this imagery to himself, claiming in unmistakable terms that the universal dominion promised to the Son of Man will be publicly and visibly realized at his return. At his trial before the Sanhedrin, Jesus repeats this claim to the high priest with even greater directness, saying “you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven” (Matthew 26:64), words the high priest treats as blasphemy, because their meaning is entirely clear.

Beyond the eschatological discourse, the promise of the Second Coming appears throughout the New Testament in ways that demonstrate how thoroughly this expectation shaped the faith of the entire early Church. In the Gospel of John, Jesus consoles his disciples at the Last Supper with the promise, “I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also” (John 14:3), connecting his return directly to the fulfillment of his promise to prepare a place for them in his Father’s house. Saint Paul structures the whole of his moral teaching in several letters around the expectation of Christ’s return, urging the Thessalonians not to grieve as those who have no hope, because Christ will return and the dead in him will rise first (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18), and telling the Corinthians that the whole of Christian life is a waiting in readiness for “the revealing of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 1:7). The Letter to Titus describes Christian life as a waiting for “our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13), using the language of hope and longing rather than fear and dread. The Book of Revelation, addressed to seven churches facing persecution, concludes with the risen Christ’s own declaration “Surely I am coming soon,” met by the Church’s response “Come, Lord Jesus” (Revelation 22:20), expressing in a single exchange of prayer and promise the entire relationship between the waiting Church and her returning Lord. The unanimity and consistency of this testimony across every layer and genre of the New Testament leaves no room for treating the Second Coming as a peripheral or optional element of Christian faith.

The Nature of the Parousia: Visible, Bodily, and Universal

Catholic teaching is precise about the nature of Christ’s return, and several important clarifications help distinguish the authentic doctrine from popular misrepresentations that have sometimes distorted Christian expectation of the Parousia. The Church teaches that Christ’s return will be visible, bodily, and personal, meaning that it will not be a purely spiritual event perceptible only to the interior eye of faith, nor will it be a metaphor for some gradual historical process. Jesus explicitly warns his disciples against being deceived by reports of a hidden or localized coming, saying “if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe it” (Matthew 24:23), and he contrasts false reports of Christ with the true Parousia by describing it as lightning flashing from east to west, visible to all without any announcement or direction to look (Matthew 24:27). The Second Coming will be unmistakable and universal in a way that requires no announcement or interpretation, because Christ will come in the same glorified humanity with which he ascended, visible to every human being alive at that moment. The Catechism confirms this, teaching that Christ will come visibly and in his glorified humanity, at a moment no one can predict but that the whole of creation will recognize with complete clarity (CCC 671). This bodily and visible character of the Parousia is directly connected to the resurrection and ascension of Christ, because the Church teaches that the very body that rose from the tomb and ascended into heaven is the body that will return; the Parousia is the definitive manifestation of the glorified humanity that Christ assumed forever when he became man.

The universality of the Second Coming presents a further dimension of the doctrine that distinguishes it from every merely human historical event. Every nation, every culture, every person alive at the moment of Christ’s return will witness it simultaneously, not as a local event confined to a particular geography but as a cosmic and comprehensive manifestation of divine glory. Saint Paul speaks of every knee bowing and every tongue confessing that Jesus Christ is Lord at the name of Jesus (Philippians 2:10-11), and the Book of Revelation presents the Parousia in terms of universal visibility: “Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, everyone who pierced him, and all tribes of the earth will wail on account of him” (Revelation 1:7). The wailing of the nations at Christ’s return is not the primary emotional note of the Catholic understanding, since the faithful await the Parousia with hope and longing rather than terror, but the text underscores the absolute universality of the event, which no person in human history can avoid or ignore. For those who have loved Christ and lived in his grace, the Parousia will be the moment of supreme and definitive joy, the arrival of the One for whom every act of faith, every prayer, and every sacrifice of love was made. For those who have rejected him, it will be the moment of irreversible and total clarity about what their rejection has cost them. The Catholic tradition has consistently presented the Second Coming not as a catastrophe to be dreaded but as the fulfillment of the deepest hope of the Christian heart, the moment when everything promised by Christ is finally and completely delivered.

The Unknown Day and Hour: Catholic Teaching on Prophetic Speculation

One of the most practically important and pastorally relevant aspects of the Catholic teaching on the Second Coming concerns what the Church says, and does not say, about the timing and circumstances of Christ’s return. Jesus states with absolute clarity in the eschatological discourse that “concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only” (Matthew 24:36), and this declaration has shaped the entire Catholic approach to questions about when the Parousia will occur. The Church takes this saying with complete seriousness, teaching that any attempt to calculate the exact date of Christ’s return, or to identify specific contemporary events with the biblical signs of the end times, exceeds what divine revelation permits and falls into a form of speculation contrary to the spirit of Christ’s own teaching (CCC 673). This does not mean that Catholics should be indifferent to the signs of the times or that the biblical texts describing events preceding the Parousia are meaningless; rather, it means that these texts call the Church to perpetual readiness and ongoing conversion rather than to the construction of prophetic calendars. The proper Catholic response to uncertainty about the timing of Christ’s return is not anxiety about when it might happen but fidelity in how one lives in the meantime, a fidelity that every generation of Christians must practice with equal seriousness, since no generation knows whether it will be the last.

Throughout history, numerous movements and individuals have claimed to know the date of Christ’s return, and the consistent failure of these predictions has never deterred subsequent generations of date-setters from making new ones. The Montanists in the second century, various medieval prophetic movements, and in more recent times a succession of Protestant preachers and popular authors have all announced specific dates or narrow windows for the end of the world, and all have been wrong. The Catholic Church has consistently warned against these movements, not because she doubts that Christ will return but because she takes with full seriousness his own warning that the hour remains known only to the Father. Saint Augustine, responding to those in his own time who sought to calculate the date of the end from the Book of Revelation, argued firmly that such calculations exceed the bounds of what God has revealed and that the proper posture of the Christian is not curiosity about divine timetables but conversion of life and readiness of heart. The Catechism echoes this in its treatment of the Kingdom of God and the Parousia, noting that the Church rejects all human attempts to claim certainty about the timing of the end, since this would amount to claiming a knowledge that Christ himself said belongs only to the Father (CCC 673-674). The practical wisdom embedded in Christ’s own teaching on this point is immense: if the hour were known, people might postpone conversion and seriousness until the last moment, while the very uncertainty of the hour compels a continuous and earnest readiness that characterizes the life of genuine faith.

Millenarianism and the Church’s Rejection of Earthly Messianic Kingdoms

Among the most significant errors the Catholic Church has addressed concerning the Second Coming is millenarianism, which refers broadly to the belief that Christ will return to establish a literal earthly kingdom lasting for a thousand years before the final end of history and the Last Judgment. The term derives from the Latin word for a thousand, “mille,” and the belief draws primarily on a selective and literalistic reading of the Book of Revelation, chapter 20, which speaks of a “thousand years” during which Satan is bound and the saints reign with Christ. The Church’s Magisterium has firmly and consistently rejected millenarianism as incompatible with authentic Catholic faith, and the Catechism states clearly that the Church has rejected even so-called “mitigated” forms of millenarianism, meaning those that soften the literal earthly reign into something less overtly material but still involve a distinct and glorious earthly period before the final consummation (CCC 676). The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a notification in 1944 affirming that millenarianism in its various forms cannot be safely taught, and this position reflects the Church’s consistent reading of the apocalyptic texts of Scripture as symbolic literature requiring careful theological interpretation rather than a prophetic blueprint for a specific sequence of earthly events. The Church reads the “thousand years” of Revelation 20 as a symbolic representation of the present age of the Church, the period between Christ’s first and second comings, rather than as a literal future epoch.

The theological problem with millenarianism goes deeper than a dispute about biblical interpretation; it concerns the very nature of Christ’s kingdom and the destiny of the created order. Jesus himself declared before Pilate that “my kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36), and the Catechism situates the hope of the Parousia within the context of the transcendent Kingdom of God that will definitively surpass and transform the present order rather than establish a reformed version of it within ordinary historical time (CCC 676). Millenarianism, in its various forms, tends to confuse the hope of the Kingdom with the hope for a politically and militarily triumphant earthly Israel or a Christianized earthly civilization, reading the prophetic texts of Scripture through a lens that the Church’s tradition does not endorse. Saint Augustine, whose City of God provided the framework that shaped the Western Church’s approach to these questions for over a millennium, argued at length against the millenarianism of his own day, proposing the interpretation of the “thousand years” as the present age of the Church that the Catholic tradition has followed ever since. The Parousia, in the authentic Catholic understanding, does not inaugurate an improved earthly history but brings earthly history to its close and ushers in the entirely new and transcendent mode of existence that Saint Paul describes when he writes that “the form of this world is passing away” (1 Corinthians 7:31), and that God will be “all in all” (1 Corinthians 15:28). This vision of the end is far more radical and far more glorious than any millenialist program, because it promises not a reformed earth but a new creation.

Signs Preceding the Second Coming in Catholic Teaching

The Catechism of the Catholic Church identifies several conditions or events that Catholic tradition associates with the period preceding the Second Coming, drawing on the teaching of Jesus in the Gospels, the letters of Saint Paul, and the Book of Revelation, while maintaining the Church’s firm position that no one can use these signs to calculate the precise timing of the Parousia. The first and most significant condition identified by the Catechism is the proclamation of the gospel to all nations, based directly on Christ’s own words in Matthew 24:14: “This gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” The Church has always understood her missionary mandate in connection with this promise, seeing the worldwide spread of the faith as both an intrinsic good and a sign of the advancing fulfillment of God’s plan for history. The second condition the Catechism highlights is the conversion of Israel, drawing on Saint Paul’s profound theological reflection in his letter to the Romans, chapters 9-11, where he speaks of “a partial hardening” having come upon Israel until “the full number of the Gentiles has come in,” after which “all Israel will be saved” (Romans 11:25-26). The Church reads this as a reference to a future and significant turning of the Jewish people toward recognition of Jesus as the Messiah, though she has always been careful to hold this hope with theological humility rather than treating it as a license for anti-Semitism or as a blueprint for predicting dates (CCC 674).

The Catechism also identifies a period of trial and tribulation preceding the Parousia, described as the final unleashing of “the mystery of iniquity” that Saint Paul mentions in his second letter to the Thessalonians (2 Thessalonians 2:7), and associated with the figure the Church calls the Antichrist, a term for the supreme religious deception that will confront the Church before Christ’s return with the temptation to abandon her faith in exchange for a false messianic solution to human problems (CCC 675). The Church’s treatment of these signs is deliberately general rather than specific, offering a theological framework for understanding the shape of history rather than a detailed sequence of datable events. Catholic biblical scholars and theologians have consistently warned against the kind of literalistic and speculative approach to these texts that characterizes certain strands of Protestant fundamentalism, in which current events are routinely matched with specific biblical prophecies to produce sensational but ultimately unreliable claims about the imminence of the end. The proper Catholic response to the signs of the times is neither panicked speculation nor comfortable complacency, but the ongoing conversion of heart, the faithful practice of prayer and the sacraments, the generous exercise of charity, and the persistent hope that characterizes the Church’s entire existence as a community of those who “wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, Jesus who delivers us from the wrath to come” (1 Thessalonians 1:10).

The Second Coming and the Resurrection of the Dead

The Second Coming of Christ is directly and inseparably connected to the resurrection of the dead, and the two events cannot be understood in isolation from each other, because the Parousia is the moment at which every person who has ever died will be raised bodily and the whole of humanity will stand together before the returning Christ. Saint Paul provides the most detailed New Testament treatment of this connection in his first letter to the Corinthians, chapter 15, the most sustained biblical reflection on the resurrection, where he argues that Christ’s own resurrection is the first fruits of the general resurrection that his return will inaugurate. He writes that “as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive,” specifying that this universal resurrection will happen “at his coming” (1 Corinthians 15:22-23), placing the general resurrection explicitly at the moment of the Parousia. His first letter to the Thessalonians provides further detail, describing the sequence of events at Christ’s return: the Lord will descend from heaven with a cry of command, the archangel’s voice, and the sound of the trumpet of God, and “the dead in Christ will rise first,” followed by those still alive being caught up together with them to meet the Lord (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17). The Church understands this passage not as an endorsement of the Protestant doctrine known as “the Rapture,” which detaches this event from the Parousia and places it seven years before the end, but as a description of the universal resurrection and gathering of all the faithful at the single moment of Christ’s glorious return.

The resurrection of the dead at the Parousia involves the bodily resurrection of every human being who has ever lived, not only the faithful but also those who have rejected God, because all will stand before the judgment seat of Christ at the Last Judgment, which follows immediately upon the Parousia. The Catechism affirms the bodily character of this resurrection with full theological seriousness, teaching that God will definitively raise the mortal body to immortal life through the power of Jesus’ resurrection (CCC 997-1000). The bodies that rise at the Parousia will be genuinely the same bodies that lived and died, not copies or replacements, transformed rather than replaced by the power of the risen Christ, and united permanently with the souls they animated during earthly life. For the blessed, this reunion of body and soul at the Parousia completes the beatitude that their souls have enjoyed since the particular judgment, extending the joy of the Beatific Vision to the whole person and bringing the complete human being, body and soul, into the fullness of eternal life. For the condemned, the reunion of body and soul at the Parousia extends the suffering of hell to the complete human person. In both cases, the connection between the Parousia and the resurrection of the dead underscores the Catholic conviction that God takes the human body with absolute seriousness, that the Incarnation of the Son has permanently dignified bodily existence, and that the final destiny of the redeemed is not the escape of the soul from the body but the glorification of the whole person in the eternal Kingdom of God.

The Second Coming, the New Creation, and the Final Fulfillment of All Things

The Catholic understanding of the Second Coming reaches its most expansive dimension when the Parousia is situated within the full scope of God’s plan for creation, which extends not only to the redemption of individual souls but to the renewal of the entire created order. The Catechism teaches that after the Last Judgment the universe itself will be transformed, and that the visible universe will be made new, sharing in the glorification of those who belong to Christ (CCC 1042-1044). This cosmic dimension of the Parousia rests on strong scriptural foundations: Saint Peter writes of the heavens and earth being transformed by fire in anticipation of “new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells” (2 Peter 3:12-13), echoing the prophecy of Isaiah who spoke of God creating “new heavens and a new earth” (Isaiah 65:17). The Book of Revelation presents the most extensive vision of this cosmic renewal, describing a “new heaven and new earth” in which “the sea was no more” and a “new Jerusalem” coming down from God out of heaven, after which God himself will dwell with his people, wipe away every tear, and abolish death, mourning, crying, and pain (Revelation 21:1-4). The Second Vatican Council, in Gaudium et Spes, connected this cosmic renewal to human history and human work, teaching that all the good things human beings have accomplished in love, justice, and truth throughout history will be found again in the new creation, purified and transfigured by the power of Christ’s return.

This vision of the Parousia as the beginning of the new creation profoundly shapes the Catholic understanding of the relationship between Christian faith and the present world. The Church does not teach that the material universe is evil or destined for simple annihilation; she teaches that it is good, made by God, redeemable, and actually destined for transformation and glorification in the new creation that the Parousia inaugurates. This conviction gives Catholic engagement with the world, including the pursuit of justice, the care of the poor, the cultivation of beauty and culture, and the stewardship of the natural environment, a theological seriousness that purely otherworldly versions of Christianity cannot supply. If the created order will be transformed and not simply discarded at the Parousia, then the way human beings treat creation and one another in the present world carries genuine significance that extends into eternity. Pope John Paul II, throughout his pontificate, consistently grounded the Church’s engagement with contemporary social, cultural, and ecological questions in the theological horizon of the Parousia and the new creation, insisting that Catholic faith provides not an escape from the world but a transformed and hopeful way of being present to it in anticipation of its final fulfillment. The Second Coming of Christ, in the full Catholic understanding, is therefore not the end of everything but the beginning of everything completed, transformed, and fully alive in God.

The Church’s Life as Preparation for the Parousia

The Catholic understanding of the Second Coming is not a passive doctrine received and stored away for future reference but a truth that actively shapes the life, worship, and mission of the Church in the present moment. Every celebration of the Eucharist is, in the deepest sense, an anticipation of the Parousia, because the Eucharist makes present the body and blood of the risen Christ who will come again, and the Church’s eucharistic acclamation “until you come again” situates every Mass within the horizon of the Parousia. The Catechism teaches that the Eucharist is the pledge of the glory to come, the foretaste in sacramental form of the wedding banquet of the Lamb that the Book of Revelation describes as the fullness of heavenly life (CCC 1402-1405). In the Eucharist, the Church already touches, in a real though veiled way, the presence of the Lord who will come in glory, and every communion received in faith is a genuine encounter with the One who will return as Judge and King of all creation. This connection between the Eucharist and the Parousia means that the most ordinary acts of Catholic sacramental life, the Sunday Mass, the reception of communion, the prayer of the Liturgy of the Hours, all carry an eschatological dimension, meaning they are oriented toward the final and complete fulfillment of all things that the Second Coming will bring.

The Church’s mission of proclaiming the gospel to all nations is also directly connected to the Parousia by Christ’s own words in Matthew 24:14, and the urgency and universality of that mission flows in part from the conviction that the Lord’s return awaits the completion of the Church’s worldwide proclamation of the faith. This does not mean that the Church can “hasten” the Second Coming by increasing the pace of evangelization as if God’s timetable were under human control; it means rather that the missionary work of the Church participates in the unfolding of God’s plan and that every person brought to faith in Christ is a step toward the fulfillment of the condition Christ himself named as preceding his return. The Church’s care for the poor and the suffering, her defense of human dignity, her work of education and healing and reconciliation, all of this belongs to the preparation for the Parousia not as a political program designed to build the Kingdom through human effort alone, but as the faithful exercise of the works of mercy that Christ will look for at the Last Judgment. Saint Paul captures the proper Christian posture toward the Parousia in a single phrase addressed to the Philippians: “our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body” (Philippians 3:20-21). To live as a citizen of heaven while working faithfully on earth is the characteristic posture the Catholic faith cultivates in every believer in anticipation of the Lord’s return.

Living in Confident Hope of Christ’s Return

The Catholic teaching on the Second Coming of Christ calls every believer to a practical and spiritually mature posture of hope, readiness, and faithful engagement with the present moment, grounded in the firm conviction that the One who promised to return will keep his word with the same fidelity with which he kept every promise of his earthly ministry. The appropriate Catholic response to the doctrine of the Parousia is neither anxious preoccupation with signs and timelines nor comfortable indifference masquerading as theological sophistication. Jesus himself modeled the proper posture in the parable of the ten virgins in Matthew 25:1-13, which concludes with the memorable instruction “Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour.” Watching, in the Catholic understanding, does not mean staring at the horizon with prophetic calendars in hand; it means living each day in the state of grace, practicing the works of mercy with generous consistency, receiving the sacraments faithfully, and maintaining the kind of interior readiness that makes every day, in principle, a day on which one could meet the returning Lord without shame or regret. The saints universally understood this: their extraordinary holiness was not the product of special knowledge about the end of the world but of an ordinary fidelity to grace sustained across the whole of their lives.

The Catechism draws together the full Catholic vision of the Parousia with a reflection on the prayer “Come, Lord Jesus” that concludes the Book of Revelation, calling this prayer the cry of the Spirit and the Bride, meaning the Holy Spirit and the Church together, and presenting it as the summary of the Christian hope for the Second Coming (CCC 2817). This prayer, simple in its words and profound in its meaning, expresses everything the Catholic tradition teaches about how believers should relate to the promise of Christ’s return, not with fear, not with obsessive calculation, not with complacency, but with a genuine and heartfelt longing for the One who alone can bring history to its true completion. To pray “Come, Lord Jesus” with sincerity is to affirm that Christ is Lord of history, that his return is certain, that the present world in all its beauty and its brokenness is not the final word, and that the One who came the first time in humility and hiddenness will come the second time in glory and power to make all things new. Catholic faith holds this hope not as a retreat from engagement with the present world but as the deepest motivation for such engagement, because those who genuinely long for the Kingdom of God work most earnestly to make its values of justice, peace, and love present and operative in the world as it is now. The entire life of the Church, her worship, her mission, her charity, and her prayer, forms one continuous act of preparation for and anticipation of the greatest event in all of human history: the return of the Lord Jesus Christ in glory to judge the living and the dead and to make his Kingdom without end a full and permanent reality.

About This Article

CatholicWiki is an unofficial, independently maintained Catholic encyclopedia. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or representative of the Holy See, the Vatican, any diocese, any Catholic religious order, or any official body of the Catholic Church. While every effort is made to ensure that all content faithfully reflects Catholic teaching as expressed in Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, the Magisterium, and other authoritative Catholic sources, readers are encouraged to consult official Church documents, their local pastor, or a qualified theologian for matters of personal faith and practice. CatholicWiki is committed to accuracy, fidelity, and continuous improvement. If you believe any content on this page contains an error, please consider contributing a correction in the spirit of truth and charity.

Kindly support Catholic Answers 101 via PayPal donation.

donate monthly
donate once only